FFS SEOs - DON'T Add GEO To Your LinkedIn Headline!
Most businesses aren’t confused about SEO because it’s complicated.
They’re confused because the industry keeps inventing new acronyms and pretending the rules have changed.
Hi, I’m Nikki Pilkington. My site is https://nikki-pilkington.com/ and in this episode of "SEO F**king What", I’m talking about... well let's be honest... I'm having a bit of a rant. And it's a rant that you need to hear if you've fallen into the same trap I've seen some other SEOs fall into recently.
This is the episode your favourite SEO hustle bro probably doesn’t want you to hear.
GEO isn’t a new discipline.
It’s SEO with a new acronym and a higher invoice.
In this episode, I cover:
Why SEOs are adding GEO to their headlines even when their skills haven’t changed
Why “AI optimisation” isn’t meaningfully different from good SEO
What Google has already confirmed about AI search
How buzzwords validate inflated pricing and bad behaviour
Why playing along makes it harder for clients to tell who actually knows what they’re doing
Why honesty builds trust, even when it costs you work
If you’re an SEO feeling pressured to add GEO to your profile just to compete, listen to this.
If you’re a business owner wondering why suddenly everything costs more for the “same” SEO, listen to this.
And if you’re about to pay someone extra because they stuck three new letters in their headline, definitely listen to this.
Share this with your SEO mates.
Share it with a business owner who’s being sold magic.
Share it with anyone who’s about to pay more money for the same work.
Chapters/Timestamps
00:00 “Why Adding GEO Is Making Things Worse”
01:25 Losing work to buzzwords
03:20 What Google has already confirmed
04:45 Why SEOs playing along is a problem
06:35 The uncomfortable truth
08:16 How the SEO industry created this mess
09:40 Why I’m not adding GEO
If you want straight-talk SEO without the jargon, follow SEO F**king What.
More episodes here:
https://seofuckingwhatpodcast.co.uk/
Transcript
If you've spent the last year calling out GEO as marketing
Speaker:bollocks, then stuck it in your headline anyway, what the fuck
Speaker:are you doing?
Speaker:This is SEO. Fucking what? I'm Nikki and I've been in SEO for
Speaker:over 30 years before it was even called SEO. I help people
Speaker:like you make money from your website by getting found on
Speaker:search. And today I'm talking about something that's really,
Speaker:really pissed me off.
Speaker:SEOs, good SEOs, people I like and respect,
Speaker:adding GEO and aeo to their LinkedIn headlines
Speaker:because they're tired of losing pictures to other people. I get
Speaker:it, I really do, but it's making everything
Speaker:worse. So here's what happened. I had
Speaker:a conversation with a potential client recently. They'd found me on
Speaker:ChatGPT, which, by the way, awesome, and they
Speaker:wanted to know what I'd done to get there. So I told them SEO.
Speaker:And they said, well, yeah, but what did you do specifically
Speaker:to be in AI search? And I said, SEO.
Speaker:And they said, yeah, but you must have done something differently,
Speaker:right? And I said, I literally did the same
Speaker:SEO I do for all my clients. And to cut a
Speaker:long story short, they went with someone else, someone on LinkedIn
Speaker:who offered AEO and GEO as well as SEO
Speaker:and charged almost three times as much. And you know what?
Speaker:There's enough business out there. There's business for everyone. So fill your boots,
Speaker:mate. Enjoy paying triple for the exact same fucking thing.
Speaker:And I posted about this on LinkedIn, as you do when you're annoyed and need
Speaker:to vent into the void. And the response has made me really sad. People
Speaker:I like, people I respect, SEOs who'd been doing this
Speaker:for years. They admitted on the post and by direct
Speaker:message that they'd reluctantly added GEO
Speaker:to their headlines. One of them said it took more thought
Speaker:than I expected, but they'd done it for clarity and positioning.
Speaker:Another said their skills better represented now.
Speaker:And a third one told me that they'd resisted for months but finally
Speaker:caved because they were tired of losing pictures. And to people
Speaker:offering the same thing with new terminology.
Speaker:And again, I get it. I really fucking
Speaker:do. When potential clients are choosing someone charging more
Speaker:than you just because they've stuck three letters in their headline,
Speaker:the temptation to play the same game is enormous. But
Speaker:it really, really bothers me. If your
Speaker:skills haven't changed, how are they better represented? By
Speaker:adding a buzzword? If you're doing the same good work you
Speaker:were doing six months ago, what clarity does GEO
Speaker:add? None. It adds precisely buck all
Speaker:except validation to the lie that GEO is somehow
Speaker:massively different from SEO. And if you've read anything I've
Speaker:written about GEO over the past year, and if you haven't,
Speaker:where have you been? Then you'll know that I think a big part of
Speaker:the whole concept is is marketing. Bollocks.
Speaker:I called it out in a blog post called what the fuck is geo? Back
Speaker:in April last year. I went after the self proclaimed
Speaker:experts in June and in January this year, Danny
Speaker:Sullivan from Google, you know, actual Google,
Speaker:pretty much confirmed what I'd been saying all along. G E O
Speaker:is pretty much SEO with a shiny new acronym.
Speaker:The guidance is the same, their work is the same. The made up
Speaker:terminology is just marketing designed to separate business owners
Speaker:from their money.
Speaker:So when SEOs, people who absolutely should know
Speaker:this, and I'm pretty sure they do, add GEO to their
Speaker:headlines anyway, pisses me right off. And it's
Speaker:not because I'm judging them personally. Like I said, I
Speaker:genuinely understand the pressure. When there are
Speaker:people out there charging thousands for AI optimization
Speaker:that just amounts to basic content structure and clients
Speaker:are falling for it. Staying principled feels like bringing
Speaker:a fucking knife to a gunfight.
Speaker:Every SEO who adds GEO to their headline makes
Speaker:the problem worse. Every single one,
Speaker:every one of us who plays along validates the lie. We make
Speaker:it harder for clients to tell the difference between someone doing
Speaker:legitimate work and someone who's just repackaged the same services
Speaker:with trendy terminology and a price hike. I
Speaker:know I'm gonna sound preachy here, and I hate myself for
Speaker:it a little bit, but I can't help it.
Speaker:Part of being seen as an expert in your field is not just doing
Speaker:the work, but educating people, helping
Speaker:them understand what they're paying for and why. When a
Speaker:client asks me what I did to appear in AI search results, I tell them
Speaker:the truth. Good SEO. When they push back,
Speaker:I explain that optimizing for search engines is pretty much
Speaker:the same as optimizing for AI search. The fundamentals
Speaker:don't change just because there's a chatbot on the other end.
Speaker:When they're skeptical, I show them the results I've achieved without
Speaker:doing anything specifically for AI. Just the same
Speaker:SEO that works. When the SEO that works
Speaker:changes, then I'll change what I do and not until then.
Speaker:And that's harder than just nodding along and adding GEO
Speaker:specialists to my invoice. But it's honest and in the
Speaker:long run, it builds the kind of trust that keeps clients coming back
Speaker:instead of chasing the next shiny thing that some dickhead on LinkedIn
Speaker:invented. When we add GEO to our
Speaker:headlines, we're not educating anyone. We're
Speaker:reinforcing the idea that there's something meaningfully different about
Speaker:AI optimization, something that requires completely
Speaker:separate expertise and justifies separate pricing.
Speaker:We're telling clients that their confusion is justified,
Speaker:that this really is a whole new discipline,
Speaker:that the Hustle Bros selling GEO services might actually be
Speaker:onto something. And they're not.
Speaker:We know they're not. And by playing along, we make it
Speaker:harder for clients to figure that out. So what's the actual
Speaker:fix here? What do we do when
Speaker:staying principled means watching those Hustle Bros who hoover up the business?
Speaker:I'll tell you what I think in just a minute.
Speaker:Here's where I'm supposed to give you a nice, neat solution. The magic
Speaker:answer to competing with people charging more for identical services
Speaker:wrapped in buzzwords. And the truth is, I don't have one.
Speaker:If I'd cracked that particular code, this would be a very different kind of
Speaker:podcast, and I'd probably be a lot richer. But this is what
Speaker:I do know. Maybe the answer is being
Speaker:louder about calling this stuff out, making more noise than the
Speaker:grifters. Maybe it's writing more content that helps business
Speaker:owners understand what they're really paying for. More podcasts,
Speaker:more articles, more guest spots. Maybe it's finding better
Speaker:ways to demonstrate value that don't require playing
Speaker:terminology games. Because what I do know is that adding
Speaker:three letters to our LinkedIn headlines ain't it? So
Speaker:every time someone asks me about geo, I have an opportunity
Speaker:to explain why the term exists, who benefits from
Speaker:it? Because it's not business owners and what the work
Speaker:actually involves. And that conversation might lose me some clients who
Speaker:want to believe in magic, but it might also build trust with
Speaker:clients who appreciate straight talk. And honestly,
Speaker:I'd rather be the SEO who told them the truth than the one who took
Speaker:their money and validated their confusion. Here's what
Speaker:I think we need to acknowledge. If we're being honest,
Speaker:this mess is kind of our own fault. The
Speaker:SEO industry's fault. The reason
Speaker:GEO grifters have been so successful is, is that the SEO
Speaker:industry has historically been absolute dogshit,
Speaker:explaining what we do. We've hidden behind jargon.
Speaker:We've made simple things sound complicated. We've treated our
Speaker:work like dark magic that only the initiated can understand,
Speaker:and that created the perfect environment for someone to come
Speaker:along with a new acronym and convince business owners that everything
Speaker:they knew about SEO was suddenly obsolete.
Speaker:Oh, you've been doing SEO? Oh, that's cute.
Speaker:But have you heard about Geo? It's completely different. You need
Speaker:a specialist. It's not completely different. It's
Speaker:not some revolutionary new technique that's different
Speaker:from what good SEOs have been doing for a decade or more. But when
Speaker:our industry has spent so long being deliberately opaque,
Speaker:can we really blame clients for falling for it? Adding
Speaker:Geo to our headlines doesn't fix this. It makes it worse.
Speaker:It's another layer of jargon, another barrier between
Speaker:business owners and understanding what they're actually paying for.
Speaker:So here's where I've kind of landed on this. I'm not
Speaker:going to add Geo to my headlines and my profiles, not
Speaker:because I'm morally superior, I'm really fucking not.
Speaker:But because I genuinely believe it would make me part of a problem
Speaker:I've spent the last year complaining about. I'd feel like a
Speaker:hypocrite. And quite frankly, I have enough to feel guilty about
Speaker:without adding that to the list. Will it cost me
Speaker:clients? Probably. Will some of
Speaker:those clients end up paying someone else loads more for
Speaker:identical work? Almost certainly. But if
Speaker:I'm going to lose clients, I'd rather lose them while being honest about
Speaker:what I can do than win them by playing the same games as
Speaker:the people I've been calling out to, the SEOs who've added
Speaker:geo to their headlines. I'm not trying to pick on you,
Speaker:honestly. I'm just sad. I'm sad that the
Speaker:industry has created a situation where good people feel they
Speaker:have to do this to compete. I'm sad that clients are being trained
Speaker:to look for buzzwords instead of expertise. And I'm sad that every
Speaker:time one of us plays along, it gets a little bit harder to push
Speaker:back. And I don't know how we fix this,
Speaker:but I'm pretty sure that adding more letters to our headlines
Speaker:isn't it. And if this resonated with you, don't keep
Speaker:it to yourself. Make sure you're following SEO fucking what in
Speaker:whichever app you're listening to right now so you don't miss the next episode.
Speaker:Share this with your SEO mates. Share it with someone who's thinking
Speaker:about adding Geo to their headline. Share it with a business owner
Speaker:who's about to pay more money for the same work. If you want to
Speaker:argue with me about this, do that as well. Find me on LinkedIn.
Speaker:Always up for a scrap. Until next time. Get
Speaker:found, make money. And for fuck's sake,
Speaker:stop validating the Hustle Bros.
